Isn't the bail-out of high-risk financial companies the same trillion-dollar scam today as it was when Congress listened to constituents and voted it down?
How much did President Bush, Secretary Paulsen, Congress, and the media contribute to the bad day for stocks on Wall Street by predicting disaster?
Doesn't the 450 point bounce-back on Tuesday prove the market over-reacted when investors sold heavily on Monday?
Doesn't the drop in the inter-bank lending interest rate Tuesday from 7.7 % to 1.7% - which is below the prime rate - indicate that the credit crunch can be over whenever the banks decide it is over? That "liquidity" is available both in the US and in growing economies like China and in sovereign wealth funds without another $700 of borrowed money from the US taxpayer?
If the fundamental problem is that individuals and the federal government are too far in debt how can borrowing another trillion dollars be a real long-term solution?
If the problem is financial trickery and "over-leveraging" by borrowing $60 agains each $1 of mortgage-based security how can buying up bad debt solve the over-leveraging problem? Won't the taxpayer owe the full $60 even if we buy the security for 50 cents?
If the problem is 2 million home foreclosures and another million foreclosures coming isn't the bail-out bill far too weak in protecting homeowners - merely "encouraging" the Secretary of Treasury to take homeowners into account and asking for a report in 6 months?
Couldn't Congress set a national mortgage interest of 2% for the next two years for everyone's mortgages and stop foreclosures?
Wouldn't this stop bad debt write-off, preserve real estate values, improve bond ratings, and get to the root of the problem without putting the taxpayer into another dime of debt?
By not forgiving debt but by giving American taxpayers the ability to earn their way out of debt wouldn't Congress resolve the "moral" issues of the crisis, making up for realtor/mortgage initiator overselling and financial industry overleveraging?
Shouldn't Congress wait till after the election if "regime change" reluctance to invest in questionable financial instruments means that global investors would rather see who the next President will be and respond to his initiatives and guidance?